Strength Training Myths for Women Over 40: 8 Things You’re Wrong About

Key takeaways

At a glance: the myths vs the truth

Myth	The truth
Lifting makes you bulky	Female hormones don’t allow it; you get leaner (Roberts 2020)
Light weights “tone”	Toning = visible muscle; that needs real load (Peterson 2010)
Cardio beats weights for fat loss	Diet drives fat loss; strength protects your shape
Too old to start	Gains into the 80s and 90s (Fiatarone 1994)
Lifting harms joints	It protects them when done sensibly (Watson 2018; Bartholdy 2017)
Ab work burns belly fat	Spot reduction is a myth (Vispute 2011)
Sore = effective	You can gain with little soreness (Flann 2011)
You need a gym	Short home sessions build real strength
Women train differently from men	Same principles apply
Protein harms kidneys	No, in healthy women (Devries 2018)
Muscle turns to fat	Different tissues; it can’t
You can’t build muscle in menopause	Harder, but absolutely possible
You must lift to failure	Close to failure is enough (Schoenfeld 2021)
You need supplements to see results	Training and protein do the work

Myth 1: “Lifting will make me bulky”

Myth 2: “Light weights and high reps ‘tone’; you can’t build real strength after 40”

Myth 3: “Cardio is better than weights for losing weight”

Myth 4: “I’m too old to start”

Myth 5: “Lifting is bad for my joints”

Myth 6: “I can target my belly fat with ab work”

Myth 7: “It only works if I’m sore the next day”

Myth 8: “I need a gym, machines and hour-long sessions”

Programme	Why	Score
Burn360	Real strength in 20-25 min	7.9
Caroline Girvan CGX	Heavy, progressive, home-friendly	7.6
Menovation	Strength built around menopause	7.7

Myth 9: “Women should train completely differently from men”

Myth 10: “Eating more protein will make me bulky or wreck my kidneys”

Myth 11: “If I stop training, my muscle will turn to fat”

Myth 12: “You can’t build muscle during menopause”

Myth 13: “You have to lift to failure every set for it to work”

Myth 14: “You need supplements (or worse) to see real results”

Why strength training matters MORE after 40, not less

Here’s the part the myths get exactly backwards. Muscle gets harder to build with age, your muscle becomes anabolically resistant, less responsive to both protein and training (Breen and Phillips, 2011), and the payoff from protein for building muscle measurably declines each year (Morton and colleagues, 2018). That’s not a reason to lift light. It’s the reason to lift heavier and eat more protein (aim for about 0.7-0.8 g per pound of bodyweight), because you’re now working against a headwind you didn’t have at 30. On top of that, strength training protects bone as it thins after menopause (Watson and colleagues, 2018), preserves the muscle that keeps your metabolism up, and defends against the falls and frailty of later life. The women who thrive through menopause aren’t the ones being gentle with themselves in the weights room. They’re the ones who finally picked up something heavy. See the sarcopenia guide and bone density guide.

How to actually start (without any of the myths holding you back)

• Two or three full-body strength sessions a week, built around compound lifts (squat, hinge, press, row, carry).
• Challenging loads: the last couple of reps of a set of 6-12 should be genuinely hard.
• Progress over time: add a little weight, a rep, or a set as you adapt.
• Enough protein: ~0.7-0.8 g per pound, spread across meals.
• Recovery: two genuine rest days and a deload every 6-8 weeks.

That’s the whole game. Start light to learn the movements, then let the load climb. See the strength training guide and reps and sets guide.

Programmes we rate for women over 40

• Caroline Girvan CGX (7.6). Heavy, progressive, home-friendly strength.
• Burn360 (7.9). Real strength in short compound sessions.
• Menovation (7.7). Strength built around menopause, led by its PowHERful strength programming.
• EvolveYou (6.1). Structured progressive strength with tracking.

Common mistakes (the myths in action)

More myths worth binning

The fourteen above are the big ones, but a handful of smaller myths quietly hold women back too. Here are several more worth clearing up:

“Machines are safer than free weights, so stick to them.” Machines have their place, but the idea that free weights are dangerous for women over 40 does not hold. In the LIFTMOR trial, postmenopausal women with low bone density lifted heavy free weights, including barbell squats and deadlifts, for eight months with a single minor injury across the whole study (Watson and colleagues, 2018). Free weights, dumbbells and bodyweight also train balance and real-world coordination that fixed machines do not. Learn the movements with light loads and sensible form, and free weights are both safe and more useful.

“You need cardio to lose weight before you start lifting.” This gets the order backwards. Diet, not cardio, is the main driver of fat loss, in postmenopausal women a dietary approach drove far more weight loss than exercise alone (Foster-Schubert and colleagues, 2012), and strength training is what protects your muscle while you lose fat so you end up firmer rather than just smaller. There is no need to “earn” lifting with cardio first; start strength training from day one, whatever your weight.

“Strength training will wreck my pelvic floor.” Lifting done sensibly does not damage a healthy pelvic floor, and strength training is generally supportive of core and pelvic health. The practical key is to brace without bearing down, keeping steady breathing under load rather than straining. If you notice leaking or a sense of heaviness, that is a prompt to see a women’s health physio and adjust load, not to abandon lifting altogether (see the pelvic floor guide).

“Building strength takes years, so why bother now.” Strength responds remarkably fast. Frail nonagenarians gained 174% strength in just eight weeks (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1990), and research in trained lifters shows even a low training dose can raise strength (Androulakis-Korakakis and colleagues, 2020). You will feel stronger within a few weeks of starting, long before any visible change, which makes the early payoff more immediate than most women expect.

“The scale will shoot up because muscle weighs more than fat.” Muscle is denser than fat, so it takes up less space for the same weight, which means building muscle while losing fat can leave your weight steady even as you get visibly leaner and firmer. The scale is a poor judge of strength training progress; how your clothes fit, your strength numbers and functional wins tell the real story. Fear of a slightly higher number on the scale is no reason to avoid the training that reshapes your body.

None of these smaller myths survives contact with the evidence or with practical experience. Like the big fourteen, they mostly serve to keep capable women doing less than they safely could.

Still more myths, cleared up

Because the myths are so persistent, here are several more that come up often in conversations at Her Daily Fit:

“Strength training will make me stiff and less flexible.” The opposite is true when you lift through a full range of motion. Taking a squat to a comfortable depth, a press fully overhead and a row through its whole path trains strength across the range and helps maintain, not reduce, your usable flexibility. Bodybuilders and lifters who train through full ranges tend to move well, not stiffly. Pair your lifting with a little mobility work and you get strong and supple, not tight and bound up.

“I’ll injure myself without a personal trainer.” A trainer can be genuinely helpful for learning form and confidence, but the notion that lifting is inherently dangerous without one does not match the evidence. In the LIFTMOR trial, women lifted heavy for eight months with essentially no injuries under sensible supervision (Watson and colleagues, 2018), and countless women learn safely at home from well-structured programmes. Start with light loads to groove the movements, progress gradually, and respect good form, and you can build real strength without a trainer if that is not an option for you.

“If I stop for a while, I’ll lose everything instantly.” Strength is retained far better than most people fear. A short break of a week or two costs almost nothing, and even after a longer gap the strength returns quickly because your body remembers the movements. A maintenance dose of as little as one session a week preserves most of your strength through a busy stretch, so an interruption is a pause, not a reset to zero. This is reassuring precisely because life does interrupt training, and knowing a gap is recoverable makes it easier to return rather than give up.

“Strength training is vain, it’s just about looks.” For women over 40, lifting is one of the least vain things you can do, because its biggest payoffs are internal. It builds the bone that thins after menopause (Watson and colleagues, 2018), preserves the muscle that drives metabolism and independence, and defends against the falls and frailty of later life, benefits that build muscle and strength even in the frail elderly (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1994). The leaner, stronger shape is a welcome side effect, but the real reasons to lift are strength, bone and healthspan, which is about as far from vanity as exercise gets.

“Older women should stick to gentle forms of exercise.” Gentle movement, walking, yoga, Pilates, is valuable, but it is not a substitute for genuine resistance training, and the idea that women over 40 should avoid challenging loads gets the physiology backwards. Higher-intensity training produces bigger strength gains in older adults than light work (Peterson and colleagues, 2010), and muscle gets harder to build with age, not easier (Breen and Phillips, 2011), so the response is to lift meaningfully, not to go soft. Gentle and genuine are not opposites; the best plans include both, with real strength work at the core.

What “lifting heavy” actually means for a woman over 40

The word “heavy” frightens women off, partly because it conjures images of competitive powerlifters, so it helps to define it plainly. Heavy simply means a load that makes the last couple of reps of your set genuinely hard while your form holds, no more and no less. For a set of 8 to 12 reps, that is a weight you could not do 20 times, one where reps 10, 11 and 12 are a real effort. It is relative to you, not to anyone else, and it climbs as you get stronger. Higher-intensity training produces bigger strength gains in older adults than light-and-easy work (Peterson and colleagues, 2010), which is why “heavy for you” matters, but heavy never means reckless or maximal.

In practice this looks far less dramatic than the fear suggests. A woman new to loaded goblet squats might find 12 to 15 lb genuinely challenging for a set of ten; a few months later it might be 25 or 30 lb for the same effort. Both are “heavy” because both make the last reps hard. The load is a moving target you nudge upward over time, not a fixed scary number you have to reach. Muscle grows across a wide rep range as long as you push close to failure (Schoenfeld and colleagues, 2021), so you have plenty of room to work in comfortable ranges while still lifting genuinely challenging weights. The mindset shift is from “heavy is dangerous” to “heavy is simply hard for me today”, which is exactly the effort that builds strength and bone.

Talking yourself out of the bulk fear for good

The bulk fear is the most stubborn myth of all, so it is worth arming yourself against it thoroughly. Start with the biology: women have a fraction of the testosterone men do, and although women build muscle at a similar relative rate, they start from a much lower absolute muscle mass (Roberts and colleagues, 2020), so the same training simply does not produce the same size. Add menopause, which makes muscle harder to build, not easier, as it becomes anabolically resistant (Breen and Phillips, 2011), and the notion that a few dumbbell sessions will make you huge collapses entirely.

Then consider what actually happens when women lift heavy. They get leaner and stronger, because building muscle while losing fat produces a tighter, firmer shape, not a bigger one. The very muscular women you might picture train hard for years, eat in a large surplus, and are often not natural, a completely different context from a woman over 40 lifting a few times a week to be strong and protect her bones. If you ever feel you are getting “too big”, which is extremely unlikely, the fix is trivial: you would simply stop adding load. But almost every woman we speak to at Her Daily Fit has the opposite problem, lifting far too light for fear of a bulk that female physiology will not deliver. The productive response to the bulk fear is to pick up something genuinely challenging and watch yourself get leaner, which is what the biology predicts and what happens in practice.

The myths that keep women lifting too light

If you trace the practical damage these myths do, most of it flows to one place: women lifting far lighter than they safely could, which is the single biggest wasted opportunity we see after testing more than 50 programmes. The bulk myth makes women avoid load for fear of size. The toning myth convinces them that endless light reps are the goal. The joint myth makes them treat weights as dangerous. The soreness myth has them chasing ache instead of progression. And the “too old” myth persuades them the window has closed. Each one, in its own way, nudges women toward weights that are too light to build the strength, muscle and bone they are training for.

The correction is the same in every case: the load has to be genuinely challenging. Higher-intensity training drives bigger gains than light work (Peterson and colleagues, 2010); muscle grows when sets are taken close to failure (Schoenfeld and colleagues, 2021); and strength stays trainable into very old age (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1994), so age is no excuse to stay light either. If you can breeze through your reps and hold a conversation throughout, the weight is too light, full stop. The whole point of clearing away the myths is to give yourself permission to lift something that actually challenges you, because that is where the strength, the shape and the bone protection come from.

What actually changes when you drop the myths

It is one thing to list the myths and another to picture the woman on the other side of them, so it is worth spelling out what changes when you finally set them down. She stops choosing weights by what feels safe and starts choosing them by what feels genuinely challenging, which is where strength and bone actually come from (Peterson and colleagues, 2010). She stops measuring a session by how sore she is tomorrow and starts measuring it by whether the load on the bar is creeping up over the weeks (Flann and colleagues, 2011). She stops fearing a number on the scale and starts noticing how her clothes fit and how much easier daily life feels.

She also stops apologising for taking training seriously. Instead of “just toning” with light weights, she lifts to build the muscle that protects her metabolism and independence, and to load the bone that thins after menopause (Watson and colleagues, 2018). Instead of believing menopause has closed the door, she treats the added difficulty as a reason to lift a little heavier and eat a little more protein, not to give up (Breen and Phillips, 2011). The practical result is a woman who is stronger, leaner and more confident, and who is building protection for a healthier, more self-sufficient later life. None of that requires talent, youth or a gym membership; it requires only setting down a handful of outdated beliefs and picking up something that actually challenges her. That is the whole promise of clearing away the myths, and it is available to any woman over 40 willing to start.

How to spot a myth in the wild

Once you know the pattern, myth-based marketing becomes easy to recognise, which protects you from being talked back into lifting too light. A few reliable red flags: any product or programme promising a “long, lean” look from light weights and high reps is trading on the toning myth, because visible tone is simply muscle you can see once fat drops, and building it needs real load (Peterson and colleagues, 2010). Anything warning women off “bulk” is exploiting a fear that female physiology does not deliver (Roberts and colleagues, 2020). Claims that a supplement or a gadget will transform your body without genuine training are selling the “you need supplements” myth; the results come from training and food, not a cabinet of pills.

Other tells include plans that promise dramatic results with no progression built in, doing the same easy weights forever does not work, and anything leaning on soreness as proof of effectiveness, when you can gain strength with little or no ache (Flann and colleagues, 2011). Programmes aimed at women over 40 that avoid the words “heavy”, “progressive” or “challenging” altogether are usually pitched at the myths rather than the evidence. The filter to apply is simple: does this encourage genuine, progressive resistance training and enough protein, or does it play on the fear of getting big and the appeal of doing less? The first is aligned with two decades of research; the second is selling you 1990s marketing in modern packaging.

Building confidence in the weights room

Clearing away the myths intellectually is one thing; feeling confident to act on it is another, especially if the weights area has always felt like someone else’s territory. A few practical moves help. Start with a structured plan, whether one of the programmes above or a simple template, so you always know what you are doing and why, which removes the uncertainty that breeds hesitation. Begin with light loads to learn the movements well, because competence builds confidence faster than anything, and there is no shame in rehearsing a squat or a row until it feels natural.

Track your lifts, because watching the numbers climb is concrete proof the myths were wrong, that you are getting stronger, not bulky, that it is working, that it was never too late. That evidence, in your own logbook, is more persuasive than any article. Give yourself permission to take up space and to lift something genuinely challenging, remembering that the biology is on your side: you cannot accidentally get big on female hormones (Roberts and colleagues, 2020), and sensible lifting is safe and protective even at heavy loads (Watson and colleagues, 2018). And be patient with the process, strength shows up within weeks, but the deeper changes to muscle, bone and shape build over months, so trust the direction rather than demanding instant proof.

The women we see thrive are not the ones who were never nervous; they are the ones who started anyway, kept the loads climbing, and let their own results dismantle the myths one session at a time. Confidence in the weights room is not a prerequisite for lifting; it is a byproduct of lifting, and it grows every time you pick up something a little heavier than the myths told you that you could.

The real cost of believing the myths

It is worth being clear-eyed about what these myths actually cost, because that is what makes them worth challenging rather than shrugging off. The most immediate cost is wasted training: a woman who lifts far too light for fear of bulk, or who does endless light-rep “toning”, spends real hours in the gym for a fraction of the strength, muscle and bone she could be building. Higher-intensity training produces bigger gains (Peterson and colleagues, 2010), so the light-lifting myths quietly convert her effort into a poor return.

The deeper cost is what she misses out on over the decades. Strength training protects bone as it thins after menopause (Watson and colleagues, 2018), preserves the muscle that keeps metabolism up and drives weight gain when it is lost, and defends against the falls and frailty of later life, protection that resistance training delivers even in the frail elderly (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1994). A woman who believes it is “too late”, or that lifting is dangerous for her joints, or that gentle exercise is enough, forgoes the single most protective thing she could do for her strength and independence in her 70s and 80s. The myths do not just cost a better body now; they cost a stronger, more independent later life. Seen that way, clearing them away is not a fitness nicety but one of the more consequential health decisions a woman over 40 can make.

There is an emotional cost too. The bulk fear and the toning myth keep women small and cautious in a space, the weights room, where confidence and progress feel genuinely good. Watching the load on the bar climb, feeling stronger at daily tasks, and realising your body is capable of more than you were told, all of that is lost to a woman who stays parked on the pink dumbbells. The myths are not neutral; they hold women back from something empowering.

Myth-busting for specific situations

The myths shift shape depending on your circumstances, so a few common situations are worth addressing directly:

• Starting as a complete beginner. The myths tell you that you need to get fit with cardio first, or that lifting is only for the already-strong. Neither is true. Beginners get excellent results from modest training, and strength responds fast even from a low base (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1990). Start with light loads to learn the movements, then progress, there is no fitness prerequisite before you are “allowed” to lift.
• Returning after years away. The “too old” and “lost my chance” myths bite hardest here. But muscle stays trainable at any age (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1994), and after a long break your body relearns movements quickly. Restart lighter than you think, rebuild over a few weeks, and progress, the strength comes back faster than you expect (see the returning to exercise guide).
• Training with a joint niggle or arthritis. The joint myth says to avoid load. In fact, strengthening the muscles around a painful joint typically reduces pain over time (Bartholdy and colleagues, 2017), and sensible lifting is protective rather than harmful (Watson and colleagues, 2018). Work within a comfortable range, progress gradually, and get a physio’s guidance for a genuinely painful joint rather than avoiding strength work altogether (see the joint pain guide).
• Already active with lots of cardio. Keen runners, cyclists and class-goers often believe their cardio covers everything. It does wonders for the heart and mood, but it does not build or fully preserve muscle or bone the way resistance training does, and hard cardio in a deficit can even cost muscle. Adding two or three genuine strength sessions fills the gap the cardio leaves.
• Worried about a health condition. Blanket fear that lifting is unsafe with a health condition is usually misplaced, though specifics matter. For most common midlife conditions, sensible strength training is beneficial, but it is reasonable to check with your GP before a new programme, especially returning after a break or with a specific concern such as kidney disease, where individual protein advice applies (Devries and colleagues, 2018).

In every one of these situations, the myth points toward doing less, and the evidence points toward sensible, progressive strength training being safe and worthwhile. The details of how you start differ; the direction does not.

Where these myths came from

It helps to understand why so many women absorbed these ideas, because it makes them easier to let go of. Most of them are a hangover from 1990s fitness culture, when women’s exercise was marketed almost entirely around being small: aerobics, light “toning” weights, and the fear of “getting big” that sold classes and pastel dumbbells. The research that has since accumulated, on strength gains into old age (Fiatarone and colleagues, 1994), on the strength benefits of genuine intensity (Peterson and colleagues, 2010), and on bone protection from heavy lifting (Watson and colleagues, 2018), simply had not filtered through to the mainstream, and cautious marketing had no incentive to challenge a fear that sold products.

Some myths also come from applying men’s bodybuilding norms to women, the body-part splits, the failure-every-set intensity, the supplement stacks, none of which suit a woman over 40 training for strength and health. Others come from genuine but misread signals: soreness feels like it must mean effectiveness, a higher number on the scale feels like getting bigger, a twinge in a joint feels like damage. Once you know the myths are period pieces from a different fitness era, or misapplied rules from a different population, it becomes much easier to set them down and train according to what the evidence actually shows. The women thriving through menopause are the ones who updated their beliefs to match two decades of research rather than 1990s marketing.

A myth-free plan for your first eight weeks

Stripped of every myth, starting is refreshingly simple. Here is a concrete eight-week route that ignores the fear of bulk, the pull toward light weights, and the chase for soreness, and instead does what the evidence supports:

• Weeks 1-2, learn the movements. Two or three full-body sessions built around the compound patterns, squat, hinge, press, row and a carry or core move, using light weights to groove the form. Do not worry about soreness or loads yet; you are building the pattern and the habit.
• Weeks 3-4, find your challenging weight. Now nudge the loads up until the last couple of reps of a set of 8 to 12 are genuinely hard while your form holds. This is “heavy for you”, and it is where the results start. Higher intensity drives bigger gains (Peterson and colleagues, 2010), so resist the urge to stay comfortable.
• Weeks 5-6, progress. Apply the basic rule: when you can hit the top of your rep range for all sets, add a little weight and drop back down the range. Keep the working sets close to hard but leave one to three reps in reserve most of the time (Schoenfeld and colleagues, 2021), rather than grinding to failure.
• Weeks 7-8, consolidate. Keep progressing, eat your protein, and notice how much stronger you feel. Strength shows up fast, often within these first weeks, long before visible change, so let that early progress motivate you.

Alongside the training, aim for around 0.7 to 0.8 g of protein per pound of bodyweight spread across your meals (Morton and colleagues, 2018), which most women under-eat, and take two genuine rest days a week. That is the whole game, free of every myth: challenging loads, progressed over time, enough protein, adequate recovery. See the strength training guide and reps and sets guide for the detail.

How the programmes we rate cut through the myths

Part of what keeps women stuck on the myths is following plans built for a different goal or population. Several of the programmes we have tested are structured in ways that quietly dismantle the myths by putting genuine, progressive strength at the centre, and they differ enough to suit different tastes and starting points:

• Caroline Girvan CGX (7.6) is the clearest antidote to the light-weights myth: heavy, progressive dumbbell compound lifts, squats, deadlifts and RDLs, and presses, in sessions of around 45 to 50 minutes, typically four to five days a week, which most women over 40 do well to trim to three or four for recovery. It shows what “heavy for you” looks like in practice.
• Burn360 (7.9), created by Susan Ohtake, buries the “you need a gym and hour-long sessions” myth by building real compound strength into short 20 to 25 minute dumbbell sessions as part of its 21-Day Metabolic Reset, paired with Eat 360 nutrition and foam-rolling recovery.
• Menovation (7.7) takes on the “you can’t build muscle in menopause” myth head-on, built around a perimenopause foundation with strength central through its PowHERful strength programming and around 30 nutrition lessons covering the protein-and-muscle picture.
• EvolveYou (6.1) counters the “women should train completely differently” idea with a large strength library of gym-friendly progressive strength and macro and nutrition guidance, applying the same sound principles that work for everyone.
• Evlo (8.0), designed by instructors who hold a Doctorate in Physical Therapy, offers evidence-based resistance training with a deliberately lower-cortisol structure and built-in Reset weeks, a good answer to the fear that strength training must be punishing to work.
• Pvolve and The Sculpt Society show that lower-impact, joint-friendly resistance-band and Pilates-style work still count as genuine training, useful entry points that debunk the “lifting is bad for my joints” fear, while Peloton pairs its large strength class library with cardio for those who want both under one roof.

The common thread is that the programmes worth your time all put genuine, progressive resistance at the core, which is exactly what the myths talk women out of. Following a well-structured plan is one of the easiest ways to leave the myths behind, because the plan does the arguing for you.

Where the evidence is still evolving

Reviewed against current literature, July 2026:

Glossary

Term	Plain meaning
Hypertrophy	Muscle growth
Progressive overload	Gradually increasing the demand so the body adapts
Anabolic resistance	Ageing muscle’s blunted response to protein and training
Toning	A marketing word for visible muscle with less fat over it
Detraining	Loss of fitness/strength when you stop training
Spot reduction	The myth that you can burn fat from a specific area

Frequently asked questions

Bottom line

Related guides

What to do next

References

1. Roberts BM, Nuckols G, Krieger JW. Sex differences in resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(5):1448-1460. PMID 32218059.
2. Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, et al. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. JAMA. 1990;263(22):3029-3034. PMID 2342214.
3. Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Ryan ND, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1769-1775. PMID 8190152.
4. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226-237. PMID 20385254.
5. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Harding AT, Horan SA, Beck BR. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: the LIFTMOR RCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):211-220. PMID 28975661.
6. Bartholdy C, Juhl C, Christensen R, Lund H, Zhang W, Henriksen M. The role of muscle strengthening in exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47(1):9-21. PMID 28438380.
7. Vispute SS, Smith JD, LeCheminant JD, Hurley KS. The effect of abdominal exercise on abdominal fat. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(9):2559-2564. PMID 21804427.
8. Flann KL, LaStayo PC, McClain DA, Hazel M, Lindstedt SL. Muscle damage and muscle remodeling: no pain, no gain? J Exp Biol. 2011;214(4):674-679. PMID 21270317.
9. Androulakis-Korakakis P, Fisher JP, Steele J. The minimum effective training dose required to increase 1RM strength in resistance-trained men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(4):751-765. PMID 31797219.
10. Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):376-384. PMID 28698222.
11. Breen L, Phillips SM. Skeletal muscle protein metabolism in the elderly: interventions to counteract the anabolic resistance of ageing. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2011;8:68. PMID 21975196.
12. Foster-Schubert KE, Alfano CM, Duggan CR, et al. Effect of diet and exercise, alone or combined, on weight and body composition in overweight-to-obese postmenopausal women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(8):1628-1638. PMID 21494229.
13. Devries MC, Sithamparapillai A, Brimble KS, Banfield L, Morton RW, Phillips SM. Changes in kidney function do not differ between healthy adults consuming higher- compared with lower- or normal-protein diets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr. 2018;148(11):1760-1775. PMID 30383278.
14. Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Van Every DW, Plotkin DL. Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. Sports (Basel). 2021;9(2):32. PMID 33671664.

Informational, not medical advice. Her Daily Fit is not a medical service and this guide is educational only. Talk to your GP or a qualified clinician about your own health, symptoms, or before making significant changes to how you exercise, especially if anything is severe, persistent, or getting worse.