Chloe Ting Review

Free on YouTube and free on chloeting.com, with a free ad-supported Core app and an optional in-app Premium reported at about $9.99 a month · the most subscribed fitness channel on YouTube, with more than 25 million subscribers and viral no-equipment challenges such as the Two Week Shred · short, high-intensity, high-impact home HIIT and abs workouts, weight-loss and aesthetic framed · sessions from about 10 to 45 minutes · A mat, and optional light dumbbells.

Researched from: the free YouTube channel and the chloeting.com challenge programs (verified August 2026) · the Core: Fitness & Nutrition app listings on Apple and Google Play · independent first-hand reviews · peer-reviewed exercise and menopause science · Not personally tested. Testing status: Data profile.

How this profile is different, and a word of caution. We have not personally completed a Chloe Ting challenge. This is a research-based Data Profile built from the free channel and website, the app listings, first-hand independent reviews and the science, scored only where the evidence reliably supports it. Two things to hold in mind for this audience. First, this is high-intensity, high-impact HIIT built around jumping, burpees and rapid abs circuits, so it asks a lot of midlife joints even though low-impact modifications are offered. Second, the brand is built on weight-loss and aesthetic framing, with programme titles such as “Get Abs in 2 Weeks” and “Shred”, and rapid-result promises that the science does not support. We cover it because it has enormous reach and genuinely free, well-structured content, but read this as a careful, eyes-open profile. This is education, not medical advice; speak to your clinician, especially about joints, HRT or existing conditions, and if food, weight or your body feels distressing, please consider reaching out to a qualified professional for support.

Is Chloe Ting right for you?

What Chloe Ting Actually Is

Chloe Ting is, at heart, a free YouTube fitness channel, and the most subscribed one in the world, with more than 25 million subscribers and billions of views. She rose to fame during the 2020 lockdowns when her “Two Week Shred Challenge” went viral on TikTok and YouTube, and her single video “Get Abs in 2 Weeks” has been watched hundreds of millions of times. The model is unusually generous: the workouts live free on YouTube, and her website, chloeting.com, packages them into free structured challenge programmes, such as the Two Week Shred and the seasonal Summer Shred, each with a day-by-day calendar telling you which videos to do and when. The workouts are short, need little or no equipment, and are built around fast, high-energy circuits of bodyweight cardio and abs work.

Around that free core sits the Core: Fitness & Nutrition app, launched in recent years and published by her company in Singapore. It is free to download and ad-supported, and bundles the challenge programmes with AI meal and calorie tracking, a large food database, workout scheduling, progress photos, streaks, team challenges and Apple Watch or Wear OS heart-rate tracking. An optional Premium subscription removes ads and adds extra features. For this audience it is worth being precise about what Chloe Ting is and is not. It is a genuinely free, well-produced library of short, intense home workouts with a motivating challenge structure. What it is not is a low-impact, strength-led or menopause-aware programme. It is high-intensity, high-impact HIIT aimed largely at a younger audience, framed around weight loss and visible abs, with no menopause, hormone or pelvic-floor content of any kind.

Who Is Behind Chloe Ting? Credibility

Chloe Ting is an Australian fitness content creator, born in Brunei and based more recently in New York, who built the largest fitness following on YouTube. Her verifiable background is worth stating precisely, because it is a mix of real credentials and clear gaps for this audience. On the fitness side, she is a NASM Certified Personal Trainer, a recognised personal-training qualification, and she has an academic and analytical background, with a Bachelor of Commerce and a Master of Philosophy from Monash University and an earlier career as an actuarial analyst. Her content is competently produced and, in 2023, she confirmed she had prevailed in a defamation case against parties who had made false claims about her, so the caricature of her as a fraud is not accurate.

What she is not, and does not claim to be, is a clinician, physician, physiotherapist, registered dietitian or menopause specialist. There is no medical or menopause advisory board behind the programmes, and no hormone-health or pelvic-floor expertise informing them. For a midlife and menopause audience that distinction matters: a personal-training certification is real, but it is general fitness authority, not clinical or menopause-specific authority. She is also candid that her video titles are written for discoverability rather than as literal promises, which is a useful admission but also underlines that the “abs in two weeks” framing is marketing, not a clinical claim. Read her as a highly capable, certified fitness creator making free general workouts, rather than a source of menopause or medical guidance.

Content and Features

What Equipment Do You Need for Chloe Ting?

Very little, which is part of the appeal. Most Chloe Ting challenges are pure bodyweight, so a mat is genuinely all you need, and the sessions are designed for a small space at home. A pair of light dumbbells is useful for the handful of programmes that add resistance, and for anyone who wants to build a little strength alongside the cardio. That said, because the workouts are high-impact and light on progressive loading, the more valuable midlife purchase is a set of adjustable dumbbells for a separate, joint-friendlier strength habit, since building and protecting muscle and bone is exactly what this style of training does least.

Recommended spec examples. These picks are curated by specification and feature fit, not personally lab-tested for long-term durability. Prices are examples; verify before buying.

How We Scored Chloe Ting: the 5.2 / 10 Breakdown

Research-based scores on our 9 weighted criteria. Because this is a Data Profile rather than a hands-on test, each score carries a confidence level. Women Over 40 is our most heavily weighted menopause criterion, and its full 12-capability breakdown follows in the next section.

Is Chloe Ting Good for Women Over 40?

For a well-conditioned woman with healthy joints who enjoys intensity, it can be a fun, free way to sweat, and the accessibility is real. The workouts are short and time-efficient, the challenge calendars remove all the decision-making, and there is a large, free library to work through at no cost. High-intensity interval training also has genuine benefits at midlife, and done sensibly it can improve fitness and help with abdominal and visceral fat. If you already train, love a challenge and your knees, hips and back are happy under impact, Chloe Ting is not without merit as one part of a wider routine.

Who it suits, and what is missing. The gaps are significant for this site, and several are cautions rather than mere limitations. First, impact. Midlife joints, and women managing hip, knee, back or pelvic-floor issues, are exactly who default high-impact HIIT can aggravate, and while modifications are offered, they are not the design. Second, training balance. The style is cardio and abs heavy with little progressive strength and almost no bone loading, which is the opposite of what midlife guidance prioritises. Third, menopause. There is no menopause, hormone, pelvic-floor or symptom content at all, so the specific needs of peri and postmenopause are simply not addressed. Fourth, the framing. This is aesthetic, weight-loss and “shred” led, with rapid-result titles the evidence does not support, which can be a difficult fit for a midlife audience often looking to move away from diet-culture messaging. It suits, at best, a fit and healthy-jointed woman who wants free HIIT; it is a weak single choice as a midlife or menopause programme.

What the wider picture shows. First-hand reviewers, including women who train regularly, describe the challenges as exhausting, very repetitive and tough on the joints, with sensitive knees flaring from daily lunges and jumps, and they typically report feeling fitter and a little stronger rather than the dramatic transformations the titles imply. That is a fair picture: capable, free, motivating content that over-promises on visible results and under-delivers on the strength, bone and menopause needs of a body over 40. Read Chloe Ting as free, energetic general HIIT best suited to younger or well-conditioned users, and steer, for a midlife body, toward lower-impact, strength-led and, ideally, menopause-built options instead.

This is the perimenopause and menopause assessment, and it is separate from the overall score. Twelve things a programme either does for a midlife body or does not, each scored out of 10 with my reasoning next to it. Together they produce a single menopause fit score, and that becomes one of the nine categories in the overall scoring below.

These are evidence-informed suitability ratings, not clinical measurements. They combine exercise science with published-feature analysis and multi-source verification, and are approximate. Individual response varies. A starting point, not medical advice. How we score menopause fit.

What the Research Says: Chloe Ting’s Approach Checked

The instinct behind Chloe Ting’s content, that midlife women want to act on their midsection, is understandable, because during the menopause transition body composition genuinely shifts toward more central, visceral fat while lean muscle declines, a hormone-related change linked to higher cardiometabolic risk.^[1] Where the science is fair to Chloe Ting is that high-intensity interval training does help: a meta-analysis of trials in women found HIIT reduced body weight and total and abdominal fat, though the effect was more evident before than after menopause, so it is helpful rather than a shortcut for a postmenopausal body.^[2] The problem is the promise. Targeted abs work does not preferentially burn belly fat: a controlled trial found six weeks of abdominal exercise produced no reduction in abdominal fat compared with a control group, because fat loss depends on an overall energy deficit, not on the muscle you exercise.^[3] So “Get Abs in 2 Weeks” is a discoverability title, not a physiological outcome, and Chloe Ting herself acknowledges her titles are written for search rather than as literal claims.

Two further cautions matter for this audience. The first is impact. High-impact movements sharply raise joint forces, with running and hopping increasing knee joint loading by roughly 90 to 130 per cent over walking, which is a real consideration for midlife knees, hips and backs and for anyone with pelvic-floor sensitivity.^[4] Modifications reduce this, but they are not the default here. The second is what HIIT alone does not build. The protective stimulus for midlife bone is progressive, higher-load resistance, as the LIFTMOR trial showed, and light or bodyweight exercise did not deliver it.^[5] Resistance training reliably improves strength and physical function in older women, which cardio-and-abs HIIT does not replace,^[6] and because the brand pairs workouts with a calorie-deficit weight-loss frame, it is worth noting that dieting without strength work sacrifices muscle: adding resistance training to a deficit prevented almost all of the lean-mass loss that dieting alone causes.^[7] Exercise does improve body composition in postmenopausal women, but the muscle gains come specifically from resistance training, which this style does least.^[8] The upshot for a midlife body is that Chloe Ting can be a source of free cardio conditioning, but it should not be relied on for the strength, bone and menopause needs that matter most, and it should be approached with impact in mind.

What Users Report: Verified Sentiment

Rating snapshot, and what it does and does not tell you: the reach is the headline. The free YouTube channel is the most subscribed fitness channel in the world, with more than 25 million subscribers, and the Core app is well rated, holding about 4.8 stars on Google Play from roughly 7,700 reviews on more than 500,000 installs, and about 4.8 on the Apple App Store, though from only around 100 ratings, because the app is young next to the channel. Those numbers reflect a large, mostly younger and enthusiastic audience. What they do not capture is suitability for a midlife body, because the app store audience skews young and the ratings measure the software and the free content, not whether high-impact HIIT is right for peri or postmenopause.

Devices, Platforms and Access

Access could hardly be easier. The free workouts are on YouTube, so they play on any phone, tablet, computer or smart TV and cast easily to a screen, and the website hosts the free challenge programmes and calendars. The Core app is on iOS and Android, is free and ad-supported, and adds scheduling, AI meal and calorie tracking, progress photos, streaks, leaderboards and team challenges, with Apple Watch and Wear OS support for heart-rate tracking and the option to play your own music from Spotify or Apple Music over Chloe’s cues. The optional Premium subscription removes ads and unlocks extra features. The one thing to keep in mind is that the app is newer and smaller than the channel, so the biggest, most proven library is still the free YouTube one. For a woman over 40 who mainly wants to follow a free workout on her phone or television, the experience is simple; the paid tier is optional and secondary to a very generous free core.

Chloe Ting specifications

Chloe Ting Price 2026: What You Actually Pay

Will You Actually Stick With It?

Chloe Ting Pros and Cons

How Chloe Ting Compares to Similar Platforms

If you are deciding between free and at-home options for a midlife body, this is how Chloe Ting sits against the alternatives. Scores come from our independent reviews and update automatically as each is scored; Pvolve is included as the menopause-built contrast and Fitness Blender and Yoga With Adriene as the free, lower-impact options.

Competitor prices are approximate; verify on each platform’s website. Scores reflect our independent reviews. See each full review for methodology.

Chloe Ting vs Fitness Blender: Which Is Better for Women Over 40?

This is the most instructive pairing, because both are free, at-home and hugely popular, but they suit a midlife body very differently. Fitness Blender offers a large free library with genuine strength routines, clearly labelled low-impact options and difficulty ratings, and it is built by trainers with a health rather than an aesthetic focus. It lets a woman over 40 choose strength, choose low-impact, and progress sensibly, which is much closer to what midlife guidance recommends.

Chloe Ting is free too, and its challenge structure and short sessions are motivating, but the default is high-intensity, high-impact HIIT with little progressive strength, no menopause content, and an aesthetic weight-loss frame. For most women over 40 choosing between them, Fitness Blender is the stronger and safer pick, because it gives you strength and low-impact control that Chloe Ting largely does not. If your priority is genuine menopause programming and pelvic-floor work, a purpose-built option such as Pvolve goes further than either, and for gentle, joint-friendly movement a free option like Yoga With Adriene is kinder to midlife joints. We would not steer a midlife reader to Chloe Ting over these for a primary programme.

If Chloe Ting Is Not Right for You: Best Alternatives

Chloe Ting is hugely popular free HIIT, but it is high-impact by default with no progressive strength and no menopause content. If that is your sticking point, here is where our other reviews point:

• Best for low-impact menopause design: Pvolve stays joint friendly with clinically informed menopause programming.
• Best free strength with real progression: Fitness Blender offers genuine dumbbell strength and a dedicated menopause program, free.
• Best gentle, joint-friendly movement: Find What Feels Good is calming, low impact and beginner friendly for a midlife body.

Chloe Ting FAQ

Final Verdict

Research Score: 5.2 / 10 · Hands-on Score: pending

Chloe Ting is one of the most popular free fitness resources in the world, and the generosity is real: the workouts are free across YouTube, the website and the app, they are short and time-efficient, and the challenge structure is genuinely motivating. High-intensity interval training also has real benefits, and for a fit, healthy-jointed woman who enjoys intensity it can be a fun part of a routine. The moderating factors for our audience are important rather than incidental: it is high-impact by default, which asks a lot of midlife joints and the pelvic floor, it does little for progressive strength and bone, it has no menopause, hormone or pelvic-floor content at all, and it is framed around weight loss and rapid aesthetic results the evidence does not support.

Chloe Ting is for younger or well-conditioned women with healthy joints who want free, short, high-energy HIIT and enjoy a challenge format. Chloe Ting is not for women who need low-impact, joint-friendly training, progressive strength and bone work, or genuine menopause programming, who would be far better served by a strength-capable free option such as Fitness Blender, a gentle free option such as Yoga With Adriene, or a menopause-built one such as Pvolve.

Testing Status

Sources and Further Reading

1. Kodoth, V. et al. (2022). Adverse changes in body composition during the menopausal transition and relation to cardiovascular risk: a contemporary review. Women’s Health Reports. Available at: journals.sagepub.com. Menopause drives a shift toward central, visceral fat and declining lean mass, raising cardiometabolic risk.
2. Dupuit, M. et al. (2020). Effect of high intensity interval training on body composition in women before and after menopause: a meta-analysis. Experimental Physiology. Available at: physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com. HIIT reduced weight and total and abdominal fat in women, with the effect more evident before than after menopause.
3. Vispute, S.S., Smith, J.D., LeCheminant, J.D., Hurley, K.S. (2011). The effect of abdominal exercise on abdominal fat. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Available at: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Six weeks of abdominal exercise did not reduce abdominal fat; fat loss requires an overall energy deficit, not targeted “spot” training.
4. Rowlands, A.V. et al. (2024). Lower limb joint loading during high-impact activities: implication for bone health. JBMR Plus. Available at: academic.oup.com. High-impact activities such as running and hopping sharply increased knee and hip joint forces compared with walking.
5. Watson, S.L. et al. (2018). High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women: the LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Available at: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Progressive high-load resistance improved bone density and function; light exercise did not.
6. Zhou, Y. et al. (2025). Effects of resistance training on muscle mass, strength and physical function in older women with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. Available at: frontiersin.org. Resistance training improved strength and physical function in older women, which cardio-led training does not replace.
7. Sardeli, A.V. et al. (2018). Resistance training prevents muscle loss induced by caloric restriction in obese elderly individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. Available at: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Adding resistance training to a calorie deficit prevented almost all of the lean-mass loss that dieting alone caused.
8. Khalafi, M. et al. (2023). The effects of exercise training on body composition in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. Available at: frontiersin.org. Exercise reduced fat and visceral fat and increased muscle, with resistance training best for muscle gain.

This is a research-based Data Profile, not a hands-on review. Access and features were verified August 2026 and may have changed. Some affiliate links may be present. This site does not accept payment from platforms reviewed. Education, not medical advice; speak to your clinician, especially about joints, HRT or existing conditions. If food, weight or your body feels distressing, please consider reaching out to a qualified professional for support.

Related Guides

What To Do Next